Belajar merupakan suatu proses yang

Belajar merupakan suatu proses yang menimbulkan terjadinya suatu perubahan atau pembaharuan dalam tingkah laku dan kecakapan. Akan tetapi kenyataannya proses belajar pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di SMP Negeri 1 Sayung banyak mengalami hambatan. Seperti peserta didik cenderung pasif saat pembelajaran. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut guru menerapkan pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw yang merupakan salah satu tipe pembelajaran kooperatif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (1) Mengetahui aktivitas belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe Jigsaw pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di kelas VII SMP N 1 Sayung (2) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dengan tipe STAD kelas VII SMP N 1 Sayung. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan Quasi-Experimental Design dengan bentuk Pretest dan Postest Control Group Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Analisis data penelitian menggunakan bantuan SPSS22. Dalam pelaksanaan strategi belajar mengajar model kooperatif tipe Jigsaw, aktivitas belajar siswa lebih aktif. Sementara pelaksanaan strategi belajar mengajar model kooperatif tipe STAD, aktivitas belajar siswa cenderung pasif. Hasil uji-t Uji Independent Sample T Tes rata-rata hasil belajar posttest kedua kelas berbeda. Hasil nilai rata-rata kelas eksperimen yaitu 82,63 melebihi KKM yang telah ditentukan. Sementara hasil rata-rata kelas kontrol dengan model pembelajaran STAD yaitu 70,51. Berdasarkan simpulan di atas diajukan beberapa saran sebagai berikut: (1) penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw pada tahap pembagian kelompok harus memperhatikan waktu pembelajaran agar berjalan efektif, (2) perlu adanya kesepakatan pembagian kelompok sebelum peraturan dalam menjalankan diskusi dan peraturan kelompok, sehingga tidak terjadi kegaduhan dan waktu yang terbuang.

Results (English) 1:

Learning is a process that gives rise to the occurrence of a change or renewal in the behaviors and skills. But the fact is the learning process on the subjects of Civics in junior high Country 1 lot Sayung barriers. As learners tend to be passive while learning. To overcome these problems of teachers applying cooperative learning, Jigsaw type which is one type of cooperative learning. The purpose of this study is to (1) find out the learning activities of students in learning using Cooperative learning, Jigsaw-type model on civic education subjects in grades VII SMP N 1 Sayung (2) know the difference in the results of learning citizenship education using learning model cooperative Jigsaw type with type STAD Class VII SMP N 1 Sayung. The design of this research uses Quasi-Experimental Design with Pretest and Postest Control Group Design. The population in this research is the learners Class VII. Sampling using cluster random sampling techniques. The data collection method used is the test, observation, and documentation. The analysis of research data using the help SPSS22. In the implementation of the strategy of teaching and learning model cooperative type Jigsaw learning activities, students are more active. While the implementation of the strategy of the teaching and learning model cooperative learning activity type STAD, students tend to be passive. Test results-Independent Sample T-test t Test results average second posttest study of different classes. The results of the average value of experimental class i.e. 82.63 exceed the KKM has been determined. While the average results of the control class with the model of learning i.e. 70.51 STAD. Based on the above conclusions put forward some suggestions as follows: (1) the use of cooperative learning model type of jigsaw in the break-out group should pay attention to the time of learning to run effectively, (2) the need for an agreement before the break-out group discussion in the run rules and rule groups, so that is not the case of noise and time wasted.

Results (English) 2:

Learning is a process that led to the occurrence of a change or innovation in behavior and skills. However, in reality the process of learning on the subjects of Civic Education in SMP Negeri 1 Sayung many obstacles. As learners tend to be passive when learning. To overcome these problems, teachers use cooperative learning of Jigsaw, which is one type of cooperative learning. The purpose of this study were (1) Determine the learning activities of students in the use model of Cooperative Learning Jigsaw type in the subject of Civic Education in class VII SMP N 1 Sayung (2) Knowing the differences in learning outcomes Civic education using cooperative learning model Jigsaw with type STAD class VII SMP N 1 Sayung. This study design using Quasi-Experimental Design with shapes pretest and Posttest Control Group Design. The population in this study were students of class VII. Sampling using random cluster sampling. Data collection methods used were tests, observation, and documentation. Analysis of experimental data using SPSS22 assistance. In the implementation of teaching and learning strategies Jigsaw cooperative model, a more active student learning activities. While the implementation of teaching and learning strategies STAD cooperative model, student learning activities tend to be passive. The results of the t-test Test Independent Sample T Test average second posttest learning outcomes of different classes. The results of the average value of the experimental class that exceeds 82.63 KKM predetermined. While the average yield of the control class learning model STAD ie 70.51. Based on the conclusions above proposed some suggestions as follows: (1) the use of cooperative learning model jigsaw at this stage of the division of the group must pay attention to the learning time in order to be effective, (2) the need for an agreement division of the group before the rules in carrying out discussions and regulations of the group, so it is not hubbub and wasted time.