Terhadap pernyataan Moeljatno di at

Terhadap pernyataan Moeljatno di atas, Romli Atmasasmita mengatakan: “Semua asas-asas yang terkandung di dalam pasal 2-9 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana merupakan yurisdiksi criminal suatu Negara, kewenangan Negara untuk menangkap, menahan, menuntut, dan mengadili seseorang yang disangka telah melakukan suatu tindakan pidana baik di dalam wilayah suatu Negara maupun diluar wilayah Negara yang bersangkutan. Sekalipun demikian kewenagan tersebut masih bersifat terbatas.”

Dari pernyataan-pernyataan di atas terlihat jelas bahwa pada hakikatnya untuk beberapa kasus yang melibatkan aspek asing di dalamnya (pelaku, tempat terjadinya, dan sebagainya). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sudah dapat diberlakukan sekalipun sifatnya masih terbatas. Yakni keterbatasan pengaturan mengenai jenis dan pelaku tindak pidana.
Sebagaimana kita ketahui bahwa perluasan perluasan yuridiksi dimungkinkan keberadaanya berdasarkan hukum internasional. Sebagaimana dikemukakan oleh J.G Strake bahwa “perluasan yuridiksi kriminal yang meliputi hak untuk melakukan penuntutan dan penjatuhan pidana atas kejahatan-kejahatan yang dilakukan dalam batas wilayah suatu negara akan tetapi diselesaikan dalam wilayah negara lain. Perluasan yurudiksi kriminal ini disebut sebagai subjective teritorial principle. Perluasan yang kedua meluputi kejahatan yang dilakukan di negara lain akan tetapi (a) diselesaikan dalam batas negara wilayah negara yang dirugikan dan (b) membawa dampak yang sangat merugikan kepentingan perekonomian dan kesejahteraan sosial negara yang bersangkutan. Perluasan yuridiksi kriminal ini disebut objective teritorial principle”.

Results (English) 1:

Against the Moeljatno statement above, Romli Atmasasmita said: "all the principles contained in Chapter 2-9 of the book of law criminal law criminal jurisdiction is a State, the State authority to arrest, detain, prosecute, and prosecute someone who is suspected of doing an act of crime both within the country and outside the territory of the country concerned. However the kewenagan are still limited. "From the statements above clearly visible that in fact for some cases involving foreign aspects in it (perpetrators, place of occurrence, and so on). The book of the law of criminal law can enforced even if their nature is still limited. I.e. setting limitations on the types and the perpetrator of the criminal offence.As we know that the expansion of the jurisdiction of the possible expansion of his presence based on international law. As expressed by j. g. Strake that "the expansion of the criminal jurisdiction which includes the right to conduct the prosecution and overthrow the criminal for crimes-crimes committed within the territory of a State but settled in the territory of other countries. The expansion of the criminal yurudiksi is called the subjective territorial principle. The second expansion of meluputi crimes committed in other countries, but (a) completed within the boundaries of the State of the country are harmed and (b) bring a very adverse impact on the interests of the economy and social welfare of the country concerned. The expansion of the criminal jurisdiction is called the objective territorial principle ".

Results (English) 2:

Moeljatno to the statement above, Romli Atmasasmita said: "All the principles contained in Article 2-9 the draft Penal Code is criminal jurisdiction of a State, the State authority to arrest, detain, prosecute, and adjudicate a person is suspected of having committed a criminal act both within the territory of a State or outside the territory of the State concerned. Yet kewenagan is still highly restricted. "

From the statements above it is clear that in fact for some cases involving foreign aspect in them (the perpetrators, place of occurrence, and so on). The Code of Penal already be enforced even though its still limited. Namely setting limitations on the types and perpetrators of criminal acts.
As we know that the expansion of its existence possible expansion of the jurisdiction under international law. As stated by JG Strake that "the expansion of criminal jurisdiction which includes the right to prosecution and criminal punishment for crimes committed within the borders of a country will however be resolved in the territory of another country. The expansion of these criminal yurudiksi called Subjective territorial principle. The second expansion meluputi crimes committed in another country but (a) resolved within the borders of the injured area of the country and (b) bring a detrimental impact on the interests of the economy and social welfare of the country concerned. Expansion of criminal jurisdiction is called objective territorial principle ". G Strake that "the expansion of criminal jurisdiction which includes the right to prosecution and criminal punishment for crimes committed within the borders of a country will however be resolved in the territory of another country. The expansion of these criminal yurudiksi called Subjective territorial principle. The second expansion meluputi crimes committed in another country but (a) resolved within the borders of the injured area of ​​the country and (b) bring a detrimental impact on the interests of the economy and social welfare of the country concerned. Expansion of criminal jurisdiction is called objective territorial principle ". G Strake that "the expansion of criminal jurisdiction which includes the right to prosecution and criminal punishment for crimes committed within the borders of a country will however be resolved in the territory of another country. The expansion of these criminal yurudiksi called Subjective territorial principle. The second expansion meluputi crimes committed in another country but (a) resolved within the borders of the injured area of ​​the country and (b) bring a detrimental impact on the interests of the economy and social welfare of the country concerned. Expansion of criminal jurisdiction is called objective territorial principle ". The expansion of these criminal yurudiksi called Subjective territorial principle. The second expansion meluputi crimes committed in another country but (a) resolved within the borders of the injured area of ​​the country and (b) bring a detrimental impact on the interests of the economy and social welfare of the country concerned. Expansion of criminal jurisdiction is called objective territorial principle ". The expansion of these criminal yurudiksi called Subjective territorial principle. The second expansion meluputi crimes committed in another country but (a) resolved within the borders of the injured area of ​​the country and (b) bring a detrimental impact on the interests of the economy and social welfare of the country concerned. Expansion of criminal jurisdiction is called objective territorial principle ".