penelitian sebelumnya pada hubungan

penelitian sebelumnya pada hubungan Wiersema, 1981; Craig dan Douglas, 1982, Garvin, 1983; Madu et al, 1995)
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji bagaimana pemenang Baldrige pemberian tampil dengan profitabilitas dan pasar metrik. Kami menilai Baldrige menghormati beberapa akuntansi kinerja keuangan kontrol pemenang penghargaan relatif terhadap standar industri yang lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan kelompok perusahaan berukuran sama dan t perusahaan secara signifikan serupa. hasil kami menunjukkan bahwa pemenang penghargaan melakukan tindakan kelompok. Dalam benchmark kami dalam hal akuntansi dan kinerja keuangan regresi ketika kita mengendalikan semua perbedaan lain yang juga mempengaruhi nilai perusahaan, leverage dan aset tidak berwujud, kita menemukan penghargaan seperti ukuran perusahaan, profitabilitas, perusahaan yang sebanding dalam pemenang dinilai 11 persen lebih tinggi dari sampel dinyatakan mengontrol. Hal ini menunjukkan pemenang penghargaan yang berkinerja keuangan superior dan dihargai lebih tinggi oleh investor Sebuah pertanyaan menarik yang berikut adalah apakah penghargaan menambah nilai ke pemenang atau pemenang adalah perusahaan lebih berhasil untuk mulai dengan. penyelidikan kami tampaknya mendukung kemudian. Penghargaan ini bisa menambah nilai pemenangnya jika sinyal kepemimpinan yang efektif dan berkualitas prod11rt sinerior di perusahaan pemenang yang sebelumnya.

Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan-perusahaan yang memenangkan penghargaan adalah perusahaan lebih sukses di industri masing-masing sebelum dan sesudah penghargaan. Bagian II menyajikan tinjauan sebagai Sisa dari literatur kertas. Bagian III membahas pembangunan pengujian kami dan sampel yang cocok, dan metodologi. Proses pengumpulan sampel dan charactcristics sampel dibahas dalam bagian IV. Bagian V menyajikan hasil empiris pada nilai-nilai perusahaan, dan bagian akhir memberikan ringkasan dan kesimpulan

II. latar belakang penelitian Meskipun ada sejumlah studi teoritis dan empiris meneliti kinerja (misalnya Lawler et al, 1995, hubungan antara kualitas, biaya dan Hendricks keuangan dan Singhal, 1996), masih ada kekurangan studi yang telah menyelidiki kinerja menggunakan keuangan dampak memenangkan penghargaan kualitas data keuangan perusahaan. Howeyer, karena studi ini berfokus pada extcrnally keuangan yang tersedia studi yang fokus pada perusahaan Baldrige. Sebuah review yang baik dari studi empiris bahwa kinerja, menggunakan kedua pasar dan akuntansi variabel, yang lain berhubungan penghargaan kualitas keuangan dapat ditemukan di Jarrell dan Easton (1996)

Results (English) 1:

previous research on the relationship of Wiersema, 1981; Craig and Douglas, 1982, Garvin, 1983; Honey et al, 1995) The purpose of this study is to examine how Baldrige Winners awarding performed with profitability and market metrics. We assess the Baldrige respect some accounting financial performance award-winning control relative to the industry standard which is better when compared to the Group of companies of the same size and t company significantly similar. our results show that the award-winning action group. In our benchmark in terms of accounting and financial performance regression when we control all other differences also affect the value of the company, leverage and intangible assets, we find the awards such as the size of the companies, the profitability, the company that is comparable in the winners rated 11 percent higher than the stated control samples. The award-winning this suggests that superior financial performance and valued higher by investors An interesting question here is whether the awards add value to the winner or winners are companies more successful to start with. our investigation seems to support then. This award could add value to the winner if the signal quality and effective leadership prod11rt sinerior in the company of previous winners. This result shows that the companies that win the award was more successful companies in their respective industries before and after the awards. Part II presents an overview of literature as the rest of the paper. Part III discusses the construction of our testing and the samples matched, and methodology. The process of collecting samples and charactcristics of samples discussed in section IV. Section V presents the empirical results on the company's values, and the final section provides a summary and conclusion II. background research although there are a number of theoretical and empirical studies examining the performance (e.g. Lawler et al, 1995, the relationship between quality, cost and Hendricks and Singhal, 1996), there is still a shortage of studies that have investigated the performance of the financial impact of using the award winning quality financial data company. Howeyer, since this study focuses on the financial extcrnally of the available studies that focus on the company's Baldrige. A review of empirical studies of the good from that performance, using both the markets and the accounting variables, other related financial quality award can be found at Easton and Jarrell (1996)

Results (English) 2:

previous studies on the relationship Wiersema, 1981; Craig and Douglas, 1982, Garvin, 1983; Honey et al, 1995)
The purpose of this study was to examine how the Baldrige Award winners performing with profitability and market metrics. We assessed the accounting Baldrige honor several award-winning control of financial performance relative to industry standards better when compared with the group of companies of the same size and t companies are significantly similar. Our results indicate that the award-winning action groups. In our benchmark in terms of accounting and financial performance regression when we control all the other differences also affect the value of the company, leverage and intangible assets, we find rewards such as company size, profitability, companies are comparable in the winner rated 11 percent higher than the sample is declared control. This shows award-winning superior financial performance and valued higher by investors An interesting question that follows is whether the award adds value to the winner or winners are the companies more successful to begin with. Our investigation seems to support later. This award could add value to the winner if the signal quality of effective leadership and prod11rt sinerior in the company winning the previous one. These results show that the firms that won the award is more successful companies in their respective industries before and after the awards. Part II presents a literature review as the rest of the paper. Section III discusses the development of our testing and the samples matched, and methodologies. The process of collecting samples and samples charactcristics discussed in section IV. Section V presents the empirical results on the company's values, and the final section provides a summary and conclusions II. background research Although there are a number of theoretical studies and empirical examine the performance (eg Lawler et al, 1995, the relationship between quality, cost and Hendricks financial and Singhal, 1996), there is no shortage of studies that have investigated the performance using the financial impact of the award winning quality of financial data company. Howeyer, because this study focuses on the financial extcrnally available studies focus on the company Baldrige. A good review of empirical studies that performance, using both market and accounting variables, other related financial quality awards can be found in Jarrell and Easton (1996)