Hasil perangkingan tersebut setelah

Hasil perangkingan tersebut setelah dilakukan uji akurasi, hasil perangkingan yang didapat sama dengan hasil perangkingan yang ada di Disdikpora Boyolali.
Dalam proses perhitungan metode SAW diatas, tidak ada nilai preferensi yang sama. Sehingga untuk menyelesaikan kasus jika ada nila preferensi yang sama, dalam sistem pendukung keputusan ini ditambahkan algoritma untuk membandingkan nilai di setiap kriteria penilaian. Berikut ini contoh nilai yang dalam perhitungannya memiliki nilai preferensi yang sama.

Results (English) 1:

The results of such a test is done after the perangkingan accuracy, the results obtained with perangkingan results perangkingan Disdikpora in Boyolali. In the process of calculation method of SAW above, there isn't the same preference value. So to solve the case if there is the same preferences of Indigo, in this decision support system algorithm to compare the value added at each assessment criteria. The following example values in calculations have the same preference value.

Results (English) 2:

The ranking the results after the test accuracy, the results of ranking the same as the results obtained in Disdikpora perangkingan Boyolali.
In the process of calculating the SAW method above, there is the same preference value. So as to resolve the case if there is indigo same preference, the decision support system is added to the algorithm to compare the values ​​at each assessment criteria. Here is an example of the value that the calculations have the same preference value.