Results (
English) 2:
[Copy]Copied!
Learning is a process that led to the occurrence of a change or innovation in behavior and skills. However, in reality the process of learning on the subjects of Civic Education in SMP Negeri 1 Sayung, Demak many obstacles. As learners tend to be passive when learning. To overcome these problems, teachers use cooperative learning of Jigsaw, which is one type of cooperative learning is easy to implement and involves active learners. The problems of this study are (1) how the learning activities of students in the use of the model type of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning on the subjects of Civic Education in class VII SMP N 1 Sayung Demak? (2) whether there are differences in learning outcomes Civic education using cooperative learning model Jigsaw with STAD (Students-Achievement Division) class VII SMP N 1 Sayung Demak.
The design of this study using Quasi-Experimental Design with shapes pretest and Posttest Control Group Design , The population in this study were students of class VII. Sampling using random cluster sampling, selected class VII D as class experiments using cooperative learning model Jigsaw and class VII E as grade control using STAD. Data collection methods used were tests, observation, and documentation. Analysis of experimental data using SPSS22 assistance.
In the implementation of teaching and learning strategies Jigsaw cooperative model, a more active student learning activities. Because every student is given the responsibility to deliver material that has been assigned to the other group members. This is consistent with the subject matter that is actualized freedom of expression. While the implementation of teaching and learning strategies STAD cooperative model, student learning activities tend to be passive. This is due to more students rely on members of the group who excel. The results of the t-test Test Independent Sample T Test average second posttest learning outcomes of different classes. The results of the average value of the experimental class is 82.63. While the average yield of the control class learning model STAD ie 70.51. So in this case the application of jigsaw learning model is more effective because the average value exceeds a predetermined value KKM. The data obtained is (thitung> ttabel) 1.775> 1.66 at significance level of 0.05, then Ho is rejected and Ha accepted. So both the sample average have different results.
Based on the conclusions above proposed some suggestions as follows: (1) the use of cooperative learning model jigsaw at this stage of the division of the group must pay attention to the learning time in order to be effective, (2) the need for an agreement sharing group before regulations in carrying out discussions and regulations of the group, so there is no noise and wasted time, (3) is recommended for teachers Citizenship Education to implement cooperative learning model jigsaw on metari actualize freedom of expression, (4) are recommended for further research in the realm affective and psychomotor.
Being translated, please wait..
