Dari hasil perhitungan diatas didap

Dari hasil perhitungan diatas didapat nilai F hitung = 0.418 dengan signifikansi 0.523. Sedangkan untuk F tabel pada tingkat signifikansi 0.05 (95%) dengan numerator = 1 dan denumarator = 28 adalah 4.196. jadi F tabel 4.196 > F hitung 0.418, dan signifkansi 0.523 > 0.05. Dengan demikian Ho : diterima, kesimpulannya bahwa rata-rata nilai mean antara belum menerapkan dan telah menerapkan ialah tidak ada perbedaan atau sama. Karena tidak ada perbedaan, tidak perlu untuk menguji lanjutan dengan post hoc test. Sebagian besar project manajer pada perusahaan konstruksi telah memahami metode Just In Time, meskipun beberapa project manajer masih ada yang belum menerapkan. Sehingga perlu dilakukan analisa lebih lanjut untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi project manajer dalam memutuskan menggunakan metode JIT. Faktor-faktor tersebut terbagi menjadi dua yakni pendukung dan penghambat.
Sedangkan untuk jenis pracetak didapat nilai F hitung = 0.029 dengan F tabel 4.030, hasil bahwa F tabel 4.030 > F hitung 0.029, dan signifikansi 0.866 > 0.05. Dengan demikian Ho = diterima, kesimpulannya bahwa rata-rata nilai responden dengan menggunakan kedua metode pracetak adalah tidak ada perbedaan (sama). Dalam satu lingkungan kegiatan proyek konstruksi mampu melakukan dua metode pracetak sesuai kebutuhan. Hanya saja adanya perlakuan kedua metode yang berbeda untuk menunjang keputusan Just In Time

Results (English) 1:

From the above calculation results obtained value F = 0418 count with 0523 significance. As for the table on the significance level of the F 0.05 (95%) with the numerator = 1 and denumarator = 28 is 4,196. so F > F 4,196 tables calculate 0418, and signifkansi 0523 > 0.05. Thus Ho: accepted, the conclusion that the average value of the mean between has not been implemented and has implemented is no difference or the same. Because there is no difference, there is no need to test further with post hoc test. The majority of project managers in construction companies have understood the method Just In Time, though some project managers still exist that have not been implemented. So the need to do further analysis to find out the factors that affect the project manager in deciding method using JIT. These factors are divided into two i.e. the supporters and a barrier. As for the type of the value obtained F preprints count = 0.029 4,030 table F, with the result that the F > F 4,030 tables calculate 0.029, and 0866 > 0.05 significance. Thus Ho = accepted, the conclusion that the average value of the respondents using both methods of preprints is no difference (the same). Environmental activities in one construction project was able to do two prefabricated method according to your needs. It's just that the existence of the two different methods of treatment to support a decision of Just In Time

Results (English) 2:

From the above calculation results obtained F count = 0418 to 0523 significance. As for the F table at the 0.05 significance level (95%) with numerator = 1 and denumarator = 28 was 4,196. so F table 4196> F count 0418 and 0523 signifkansi> 0.05. Thus Ho: accepted, the conclusion that the average value of the mean between not apply and has implemented is that there is no difference or equal. Because there is no difference, no need to test further with post hoc test. Most project managers in construction companies have to understand the method of Just In Time, although some project managers still have yet to implement. So we need further analysis to determine the factors that influence project managers decided to use JIT method. These factors are divided into two supporters and obstacles.
As for the type of precast obtained F count = 0.029 to 4.030 F table, the result that the F tables 4.030> F count 0029, and the significance of 0.866> 0.05. Thus Ho = acceptable, the conclusion that the average value of the respondents using both methods precast is no difference (same). In one neighborhood construction project activity capable of performing two precast methods as needed. It's just that their treatment of these two different methods for supporting decision-Just In Time